×
249
Fashion Jobs
SPORTS DIRECT
Loss Prevention Supervisor - Sports Direct
Permanent · CARRICKMINES
SPORTS DIRECT
Loss Prevention Supervisor - Sports Direct
Permanent · LIMERICK
SPORTS DIRECT
Loss Prevention Supervisor - Sports Direct
Permanent · DUBLIN
PHV
Country vm Manager, Ireland
Permanent · Dublin
CANADA GOOSE
Security Ambassador
Permanent · DUBLIN
BESTSELLER
Jack & Jones Sales Representative
Permanent · Dublin 12
BESTSELLER
Vero Moda Sales Representative
Permanent · Dublin 12
BESTSELLER
Junior Head Office Sales Representative
Permanent · Dublin 12
SPORTS DIRECT
Loss Prevention Supervisor - Sports Direct
Permanent · DUBLIN
SPORTS DIRECT
Loss Prevention Supervisor - Sports Direct
Permanent · NEWBRIDGE
PRIMARK
External Reporting And Compliance Accountant
Permanent · Dublin
PRIMARK
Business Analyst
Permanent · Dublin
PRIMARK
Senior Finance Transformation Manager- Payroll
Permanent · Dublin
PRIMARK
Team Manager Dublin Area
Permanent · Dublin
PRIMARK
Business Analyst - Data & Analytics
Permanent · Dublin
ESTÉE LAUDER
Clinique - Consultant - Brown Thomas - 37.5 Hours
Permanent · Cork
PRIMARK
Cyber Security Operations Engineer
Permanent · Dublin
PRIMARK
Cyber Security Operations Analyst
Permanent · Dublin
PRIMARK
Administrator – Buying, Merchandising And Design
Permanent · Dublin
PRIMARK
Senior Finance Transformation Manager - Source to Pay
Permanent · Dublin
PRIMARK
Associate Product Owner, Epos
Permanent · Dublin
PRIMARK
Finance Business Partner Analyst
Permanent · Dublin
Translated by
Nicola Mira
Published
Sep 16, 2022
Reading time
2 minutes
Share
Download
Download the article
Print
Click here to print
Text size
aA+ aA-

H&M, Decathlon accused of unclear sustainability claims in the Netherlands

Translated by
Nicola Mira
Published
Sep 16, 2022

Since 2021, the Netherlands’s consumer rights authority has focused on investigating the sometimes misleading sustainability claims made by apparel brands. The Dutch CRA has focused its investigation on two international retailers in particular, H&M and Decathlon, both accused of not sufficiently explaining nor actually proving the sustainable features they claim some of their products have.


H&M dress whose description mentions ‘conscious choice’ - H&M


“Decathlon and H&M describe their products with generic terms such as ‘ecodesign’ and ‘conscious’ without clearly spelling out their sustainability benefits,” wrote CRA in a statement. As a result of the investigation, both retailers have pledged they will change their working methods and will inform customers more effectively, a commitment that the Dutch CRA will be monitoring for two years.

“Companies that promote their products with sustainability claims must ensure that these are correct, clear and verifiable. Otherwise, consumers will be misled,” added the CRA, which did not however impose sanctions on either retailer.

At the same time, Decathlon and H&M have respectively made donations of €400,000 and €500,000 to various organisations advocating sustainable development, especially in the apparel sector.

Contacted by FashionNetwork.com, Swedish group H&M acknowledged that its website’s sustainability information “could have been provided in a clearer and more comprehensive way,” and stated that “changes are under way,” with the goal of sharing more comprehensive data on its efforts towards sustainable development. The group also pointed out that the issues raised by the Dutch CRA “did not concern the dissemination of false information.”

In addition, H&M has decided to remove from its e-shop the mention ‘conscious choice’, which characterises a number of its products. An ongoing job that will be completed by the end of October.

As for Decathlon, it stated on its Dutch site that it is fully cooperating with the CRA and is currently working to improve how it “communicates about eco-design,” a term that refers, among other things, to material choices and production process optimisation.

Recently, other fashion brands have been singled out for their poor communication regarding the supposed sustainable nature of their products. As was the case of British fashion e-tailer Asos, the subject of an investigation by the UK's Competition and Markets Authority, following which it removed the ‘responsible edit’ section from its site. In June, Zero Waste France filed a complaint against Adidas and New Balance, claiming their commitment to environmentally friendly practices is “mere window dressing.”

Copyright © 2023 FashionNetwork.com All rights reserved.